In The News Today...
Thread Rating:
August 22nd, 2019 at 2:09:16 AM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18212 |
Why should it be? Are you saying we should deny people the right to marry who they love? The President is a fink. |
August 22nd, 2019 at 3:43:32 AM permalink | |
Shrek Member since: Aug 13, 2019 Threads: 6 Posts: 1635 |
I oppose any weird & illogical form of marriage, but like I said in another post, I'm at the point where I just don't give a sh*t anymore. If something as crazy as same sex marriage can be legal, why can't polygamy?? Hell, let's just legalize everything!* *I'm dead serious about this I know this may sound horrible when you first hear it, but I honestly want to see society collapse in my lifetime. Because that way we can rebuild it that much sooner. |
August 22nd, 2019 at 3:59:00 AM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18762 | Without religion or a cult, a relationship like that will be about as common as it's ever been. Both those things have the power to involve a much greater number of people with a religious basis or cult leader. You'd never convince so many of the women in Colorado City into Polygamy if someone hadn't convinced them the will of God was requiring it. Nor in Muslim countries. Also it's part of the Old Testament life as well. You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
August 22nd, 2019 at 4:40:13 AM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18212 |
The article is not really "polygamy." Polygamy is having more than one spouse, almost always a guy with multiple wives. This is A marries B, B marries C, C marries A. So it is Polygamy in a way, but it is more than that. Still, I have to say any pro-gay marriage argument I have heard simply must by extension support polygamy and an arrangement like this. They love each other. They want to marry who they choose. The current laws discriminate against their lifestyle. It is none of your business. Who are you to say it is bad for their kids, if any? Change my mind. The President is a fink. |
August 22nd, 2019 at 5:03:46 AM permalink | |
Dalex64 Member since: Mar 8, 2014 Threads: 3 Posts: 3687 | I am ok with it, but I think marriage needs to have a legal contract detailing rights and responsibilities, and rules for handling dissolution. All up front. "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." Daniel Patrick Moynihan |
August 22nd, 2019 at 5:17:01 AM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18212 |
That is called a prenup. States have laws for property distribution beyond that. The President is a fink. |
August 22nd, 2019 at 9:58:58 AM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
So A has more than one spouse, that's the definition of polygamy. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
August 22nd, 2019 at 10:03:34 AM permalink | |
aceofspades Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 83 Posts: 2019 |
Maybe I am truly MGTOW -- hmmmm |
August 22nd, 2019 at 10:50:37 AM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18212 |
I think a true test is asking "do I see anything to be gained in marriage/relationship besides getting laid." It helps if you never wanted kids. Some people say marriage without kids is a waste of time. I don't totally agree there, but I think the statement is right more than wrong. The President is a fink. |
August 22nd, 2019 at 11:06:37 AM permalink | |
Shrek Member since: Aug 13, 2019 Threads: 6 Posts: 1635 |
You know how libbies are. They don't care about logic or being consistent, so I can see them opposing polygamy even if you throw their own gay marriage argument in their faces. They don't care. They have no shame. |