Charlie Kirk murder

Quote: AZDuffman

Infallible proof. Democrats pushed for it in democrat run areas.

Well OF COURSE people with a brain prefer mail in voting...much easier and convienient.

We've had it for DECADES without any problems.

Sorry old boy but you'll need to do better than that, i.e. provide documented proof...you can't, yet you keep carping...mind-fucked, brain-washed and following the pied piper in lockstep...

Quote: missedhervee

Well OF COURSE people with a brain prefer mail in voting...much easier and convienient.

We've had it for DECADES without any problems.

Sorry old boy but you'll need to do better than that, i.e. provide documented proof...you can't, yet you keep carping...mind-fucked, brain-washed and following the pied piper in lockstep...

How can they know no problems if it is never audited? People need to actually show up. If they are too lazy too bad. It is an election not publishers clearing house.

Quote: AZDuffman

How can they know no problems if it is never audited? People need to actually show up. If they are too lazy too bad. It is an election not publishers clearing house.

"Audited?"

This ain't tax returns we're talking about, it's people voting.

Why should people be required to physically travel from the comfort of their home just to vote, when mail in voting, a viable alternative, exists and has been proven to be workable?

Again, we've had it for many years out west without any problems at all.

Sure, there were and will be rare instances of fraud but the same is true for voting in polling places: hello, fake ID...greetings, crooked Az. poll workers...

Quote: missedhervee

"Audited?"

This ain't tax returns we're talking about, it's people voting.

Voting is important enough to audit to verify, or do you not think so?

Quote:

Why should people be required to physically travel from the comfort of their home just to vote, when mail in voting, a viable alternative, exists and has been proven to be workable?

For security. It is voting, not ordering on Amazon.

So, from what is being reported the guy he was in a relationship is being cooperative with the FBI, which I give him credit for. Unless and until it is proven otherwise we can assume he was in the dark about it.

However, those of you who were on here saying trans-culture had nothing to do with it, well, the shooter being so involved with a trans guy so far proves otherwise. He at the least was clearly down with the life, along with being far-left in other parts of his life.

Quote: AZDuffman

So, from what is being reported the guy he was in a relationship is being cooperative with the FBI, which I give him credit for. Unless and until it is proven otherwise we can assume he was in the dark about it.

However, those of you who were on here saying trans-culture had nothing to do with it, well, the shooter being so involved with a trans guy so far proves otherwise. He at the least was clearly down with the life, along with being far-left in other parts of his life.

If he was in a straight relationship would straight culture have anything to do with his actions?

Though, let's assume the shooter was trans (zero evidence for this.) If Charlie Kirk was attempting to seize all guns from trans people, wouldn't this be justification to take action against him by your logic? You have stated before that the 2nd amendment exists to be a stopgap against tyrannical organizations?

Think of it this way. If the speaker was a militant atheist who wanted to take guns from all Christians, and a Christian gun lover killed him, you would no doubt be celebrating...

This is the same circumstance except he was killed by a trans gun lover (if your trans assertation is accurate, which I am skeptical of.)

Trump says a straight guy with a trans girlfriend? Well, that's not possible.

; )

Quote: Gandler

If he was in a straight relationship would straight culture have anything to do with his actions?

No, because there is not a "straight culture." Such a relationship would be mainstream.

Quote:

Though, let's assume the shooter was trans (zero evidence for this.) If Charlie Kirk was attempting to seize all guns from trans people, wouldn't this be justification to take action against him by your logic? You have stated before that the 2nd amendment exists to be a stopgap against tyrannical organizations?

Well, Charlie is not a the government so cannot take anyone's guns away. So your question makes no sense. And while the shooter was not trans, he was in a relationship with a trans guy. So he was clearly down with the trans movement.

Quote:

Think of it this way. If the speaker was a militant atheist who wanted to take guns from all Christians, and a Christian gun lover killed him, you would no doubt be celebrating...

No, I would not. I am not like the pieces of garbage out there celebrating this week. I'd be angry with the shooter for making us all look bad.

See, you cannot handle the trans-connection here. A trans shot up a religious school recently, now this. Maybe it is time you need to figure out that these people have some kind of mental issues and instead of encouraging all the pronoun nonsense we need to look at what is causing this all of the sudden.

Meanwhile I see more and more left wingers getting fired from jobs for showing who and what they are celebrating this. It is sad to be so right about what the left is all about.

How does the increased trans violence correlate with the rise of the nationalization of the anti-trans movement of the right winging hate movement in the US?

I suspect really well.

"Prove Me Wong." Charlie Kirk.

I'd say the anti-trans movement has been legislatively really successful. They're literally being shut into a smaller and smaller box. I suppose most people think they should go quietly. And maybe they should. But some aren't.

As you had an MLK< you also had the Black Panthers. You got both reactions to race discrimination.