Owning Mahowny

May 22nd, 2014 at 4:58:57 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Quote: FrGamble
Since sin is the easiest thing in the world to prove you and I must have different concepts of sin.


Father,
I have read a fair number of philosophy texts in my life, but I confess that the definition given below is very difficult for me to understand.


Quote: Catholic Encyclopedia
Nature of sin
Since sin is a moral evil, it is necessary in the first place to determine what is meant by evil, and in particular by moral evil. Evil is defined by St. Thomas (De malo, 2:2) as a privation of form or order or due measure. In the physical order a thing is good in proportion as it possesses being. God alone is essentially being, and He alone is essentially and perfectly good. Everything else possesses but a limited being, and, in so far as it possesses being, it is good. When it has its due proportion of form and order and measure it is, in its own order and degree, good. (See GOOD.) Evil implies a deficiency in perfection, hence it cannot exist in God who is essentially and by nature good; it is found only in finite beings which, because of their origin from nothing, are subject to the privation of form or order or measure due them, and, through the opposition they encounter, are liable to an increase or decrease of the perfection they have: "for evil, in a large sense, may be described as the sum of opposition, which experience shows to exist in the universe, to the desires and needs of individuals; whence arises, among human beings at least, the suffering in which life abounds" (see EVIL).

According to the nature of the perfection which it limits, evil is metaphysical, physical, or moral. Metaphysical evil is not evil properly so called; it is but the negation of a greater good, or the limitation of finite beings by other finite beings. Physical evil deprives the subject affected by it of some natural good, and is adverse to the well-being of the subject, as pain and suffering. Moral evil is found only in intelligent beings; it deprives them of some moral good. Here we have to deal with moral evil only. This may be defined as a privation of conformity to right reason and to the law of God. Since the morality of a human act consists in its agreement or non-agreement with right reason and the eternal law, an act is good or evil in the moral order according as it involves this agreement or non-agreement. When the intelligent creature, knowing God and His law, deliberately refuses to obey, moral evil results.

Sin is nothing else than a morally bad act (St. Thomas, "De malo", 7:3), an act not in accord with reason informed by the Divine law. God has endowed us with reason and free-will, and a sense of responsibility; He has made us subject to His law, which is known to us by the dictates of conscience, and our acts must conform with these dictates, otherwise we sin (Romans 14:23). In every sinful act two things must be considered, the substance of the act and the want of rectitude or conformity (St. Thomas, I-II:72:1). The act is something positive. The sinner intends here and now to act in some determined matter, inordinately electing that particular good in defiance of God's law and the dictates of right reason. The deformity is not directly intended, nor is it involved in the act so far as this is physical, but in the act as coming from the will which has power over its acts and is capable of choosing this or that particular good contained within the scope of its adequate object, i.e. universal good (St. Thomas, "De malo", Q. 3, a. 2, ad 2um). God, the first cause of all reality, is the cause of the physical act as such, the free-will of the deformity (St. Thomas I-II:89:2; "De malo", 3:2). The evil act adequately considered has for its cause the free-will defectively electing some mutable good in place of the eternal good, God, and thus deviating from its true last end.

In every sin a privation of due order or conformity to the moral law is found, but sin is not a pure, or entire privation of all moral good (St. Thomas, "De malo", 2:9; I-II:73:2). There is a twofold privation; one entire which leaves nothing of its opposite, as for instance, darkness which leaves no light; another, not entire, which leaves something of the good to which it is opposed, as for instance, disease which does not entirely destroy the even balance of the bodily functions necessary for health. A pure or entire privation of good could occur in a moral act only on the supposition that the will could incline to evil as such for an object. This is impossible because evil as such is not contained within the scope of the adequate object of the will, which is good. The sinner's intention terminates at some object in which there is a participation of God's goodness, and this object is directly intended by him. The privation of due order, or the deformity, is not directly intended, but is accepted in as much as the sinner's desire tends to an object in which this want of conformity is involved, so that sin is not a pure privation, but a human act deprived of its due rectitude. From the defect arises the evil of the act, from the fact that it is voluntary, its imputability.
May 22nd, 2014 at 5:33:03 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 146
Posts: 25011
Quote: FrGamble
I maintain that if a kid doesn't feel bad after hitting a dog with a hammer you don't have a spoiled kid you have a sociopath. .


They don't, and they aren't sociopaths. They
don't understand cause and effect at that
age. I have a grand daughter who just turned
2 and from a year old on, you constantly are
teaching them right from wrong. All day long
it's a dialog of don't do this and don't do that.

Be nice to kitty, don't pull his tail. Don't hit
the dog, it's not nice. This is how they learn,
kids that age no nothing of sharing or morality,
they have to be taught.

I mentioned before that the missionaries in CA
gave up on the natives and started focusing
on the kids. They could not convince the natives
that sin existed, they could never conceive of
such a thing. They got so sick of being hounded
that they pretended to believe, but would go
back to their old ways as soon as the priests left.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
May 22nd, 2014 at 6:01:21 PM permalink
FrGamble
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 67
Posts: 7596
I think your anthropology, your logic, and definitely your history are wrong.

If kids at that age don't understand cause and effect then you are in effect not teaching them morality or right and wrong you are pointing out to them that when you pull the cat's tail it hurts. You don't have to say be nice to the cat just teach them that pulling the tail is not being nice to the cat. Anyway, I just happen to think we are born already knowing right from wrong, it's in our nature. After all we are made in the image and likeness of God. Despite you holding up the example of two year olds I think it is obvious that we want to do good and naturally feel shame when we don't do what we know we should do. Why we don't do what we know we should do is the mystery of original sin. Let's take this discussion back to that thread shall we?

Finally the missionaries in CA came with a message of how the people could truly free themselves from the guilt of their actions they knew were bad, it began with letting them know they are unconditionally loved by God even in the midst of their struggles. Again it is not hard to convince anyone that sin exists and that you and I are sinners, the hardest thing to convince them, you, and I of is that even in our sin we are loved and forgiven by Jesus Christ. I find it insulting and not intelligent to say that those who believed that they were loved despite their mistakes by God were just pretending. History does not bear you out nor does the example of so many people who finally found the answer to our human condition in the Gospel of Jesus.
“It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” (
May 22nd, 2014 at 6:46:42 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 146
Posts: 25011
Quote: Pacomartin



Catholic Encyclopedia. Nature of sin
Since sin is a moral evil,


There is so much wrong with the entry, I'm just
going to address the first wrong premise.

Morality in nature does not exist. It's a concept,
an idea, it's made up to make a point. Because
it's not real, sin can't be real. My wife has been
trying to get me to accept Jesus and my savior
for 30 years. I always tell her, sure, just prove to
me there is something to be saved from. Prove
sin exists. So she quotes what other people say
about it, which isn't proof at all.

Morality exists, but only in our heads. We aren't
born moral or immoral, we learn what it is as we go
along. Saying a person is born in sin is not true,
in fact it's impossible.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
May 22nd, 2014 at 6:59:58 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 146
Posts: 25011
Quote: FrGamble
Anyway, I just happen to think we are born already knowing right from wrong,.


Nope. All you have to do is be around little
kids after they start walking and figuring
things out. They know nothing about right
and wrong, all they know is exploration and
feeling. How many toddlers drown in pools
every year or die falling out windows or down
stairs. You have to teach them everything,
including and especially how to interact
properly with others.

This is why religious groups, Catholics especially,
get to the kids at the youngest age possible.
Get the ideas into their heads early enough and
the guilt and shame of living will follow them to
their graves.

Why wife is Baptist. One of her favorite questions
to me is, aren't you ashamed that Jesus died on
cross for you and you ignore him? I usually answer,
how about the other 100,000+ men who got crucified,
should I feel guilty about them too?
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
May 22nd, 2014 at 7:19:28 PM permalink
FrGamble
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 67
Posts: 7596
Quote: Evenbob
There is so much wrong with the entry, I'm just
going to address the first wrong premise.

Morality in nature does not exist. It's a concept,
an idea, it's made up to make a point. Because
it's not real, sin can't be real. My wife has been
trying to get me to accept Jesus and my savior
for 30 years. I always tell her, sure, just prove to
me there is something to be saved from. Prove
sin exists. So she quotes what other people say
about it, which isn't proof at all.

Morality exists, but only in our heads. We aren't
born moral or immoral, we learn what it is as we go
along. Saying a person is born in sin is not true,
in fact it's impossible.


okay there is actually a lot of things I agree with in this last post. I'm sorry if I've come on too strong, but I think you can appreciate how baffling it is to me to meet someone who thinks there is no sin.

The first premise is actually right down your aisle. Evil is a privation of good not a thing unto itself. Sin is a deformed desire for good and there is no such thing as a perfectly evil act. Maybe this can help you get your head around the reality of sin. Sin is bad, but it has elements of good in it, just twisted around. If sin was all bad nobody would ever commit it.

I also agree that we aren't born moral or immoral, our choices determine that. As I said before the doctrine of Christianity does not say that you or anyone is born in sin. We are born awesome children of God who have been weakened in our nature. I really don't know what you are looking for in regards to proof for this reality. I am proof of it and so are you. We are hopelessly imperfect beings with hopeful dreams and desires for perfection. This is the paradox of the human person and I don't know how you can either deny it or explain it in any other way than sin.
“It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” (
May 22nd, 2014 at 7:59:10 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 146
Posts: 25011
Quote: FrGamble
Evil is a privation of good
.


Good and evil do not exist except as an
opinion. What's good for one is evil
for another. A simple observation of life
proves this every day.

Consider the casino. I look at losing as a
bad thing, it does me no good and I
hate it. The casino considers me losing
to be such a good thing, they go out
of their way to try and make me lose.

Good and evil are a matter of your position
in the event or idea. By themselves, they
don't exist. Sin is just another opinion,
built on other faulty opinions, that have no
existence outside of our minds.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
May 22nd, 2014 at 8:14:33 PM permalink
Wizard
Administrator
Member since: Oct 23, 2012
Threads: 239
Posts: 6095
Quote: FrGamble
Bob teaching someone right from wrong is really just developing a natural sense that is already within us all.


Father, you've said before that without god there is no morality and that good and bad are just empty philosophical concepts, if I understand your argument correctly. You've also expressed surprise when atheists have found a moral code that you approve of.

So, it comes as a surprise that you now say that we all have a natural sense of right and wrong within us. I agree with the statement, but it seems at odds with things you've posted before. Hopefully you won't ask me to dig up exact quotes.
Knowledge is Good -- Emil Faber
May 22nd, 2014 at 8:31:35 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 146
Posts: 25011
Quote: Wizard
Father, you've said before that without god there is no morality and that good and bad are just empty philosophical concepts,


Did he really say that? I said essentially the same
thing in another post a few minutes ago. Sin is
also an empty philosophical concept. And a really
empty one because it leans on other empty
concepts for its validity.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
May 22nd, 2014 at 8:38:06 PM permalink
Wizard
Administrator
Member since: Oct 23, 2012
Threads: 239
Posts: 6095
Quote: Evenbob
Did he really say that?


I don't remember his exact words, but that was the gist of it. That without god there is no morality.
Knowledge is Good -- Emil Faber