Scottish independence -- How would you vote?
Poll
No votes (0%) | |||
5 votes (62.5%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
3 votes (37.5%) |
8 members have voted
September 14th, 2014 at 4:58:57 PM permalink | |
Pacomartin Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 1068 Posts: 12569 |
I'm afraid it is not just Americans who do it, but also Latin Americans. They say Inglaterra. But I imagine the British just assume Americans have read a little bit of British history. As I understand it, you can use British as an adjective for someone from the UK, but you can't say "Great Britain" anymore since that would exclude Northern Ireland. I don't know what you call someone from Northern Ireland. I don't think "Irish" is proper, and I understand the "Scotch Irish" is an American term. I think that "Ulster Scot" is more of a historical term. What is the correct term that you use? |
September 14th, 2014 at 6:29:39 PM permalink | |
Wizard Administrator Member since: Oct 23, 2012 Threads: 239 Posts: 6095 | The market at BetFair.com suggests the probability YES will win is about 21%. In sports I'm normally on the underdog, but when voting is involved I tend to respect the market and bet on the favorite. At least in US presidential politics and the Academy Awards. Knowledge is Good -- Emil Faber |
September 14th, 2014 at 6:32:14 PM permalink | |
Wizard Administrator Member since: Oct 23, 2012 Threads: 239 Posts: 6095 |
I'm not saying you're wrong, but how many countries were there before World World I and now? How many countries now lay (or is it "lie") in what was Austria-Hungary? Knowledge is Good -- Emil Faber |
September 14th, 2014 at 8:11:38 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 | Scottish independence is about as exciting as S Carolina being separated from N Carolina. Yawn. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
September 15th, 2014 at 12:09:59 AM permalink | |
Pacomartin Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 1068 Posts: 12569 |
Scottish independence goes back to the time of the 30 years wars which ended up with the Peace of Westphalia. At that time Scotland shared a monarch with England under Queen Elizabeth, but maintained a separate parliament. It was only in 1707 that the parliaments were united, and the Prime Minister began to emerge as a power that equaled that of the monarch. About 1878 and the congress of Berlin was probably the period of the least number of power in europe, and it has broken up since then. But if Europe breaks up into it's 16th century identifiable nations, then it will be a nightmare. Venetian Republic, Piedmont, Naples, Sardinia, Hanover, Savoy, etc. All these places have minor independence movements. |
September 15th, 2014 at 6:45:19 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
If I lived in Scotland, then presumably I'd know what's involved and could cast a vote informed by some facts. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
September 15th, 2014 at 7:43:26 AM permalink | |
TheCesspit Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 23 Posts: 1929 |
Interesting, as polls seem to run it around 50/50. Certainly the narrow view I have with voters in Scotland it's a down the middle split. It is said that your life flashes before your eyes just before you die.... it's called Life |
September 16th, 2014 at 4:10:58 AM permalink | |
Pacomartin Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 1068 Posts: 12569 | The period when Mary Queen of Scots was a baby was dubbed by later historians as the rough wooing. Henry VIII had once killed his brother in law, the former King of Scotland, and tried to marry her mother (who wisely valued her head). Now he was a widower with a young son, and he wanted his son to marry the infant Mary Queen of Scots and unite the kingdom under his own terms. The series of battles that resulted were considered a king of violent attempt at marriage of the kingdoms. When Henry VIII died on 28 January 1547 in his 37th year as monarch, the battles were replaced with what was probably history's first public relations campaign. The English had a boy king, and the Scottish had a girl queen, and the English tried to persuade the Scots that they should respect Britain's kinship. The Scots could not be persuaded, and married Mary, Queen of Scots off to the future King of France. The justifiable paranoia of Queen Elizabeth meant that she never married, so eventually Scotland's royal family became the same as England's royal family. But then the English threw out their Catholic King who was beloved of the Scots. His progeny leads to a line of succession which is now the royal family of the tiny principality of Liechtenstein (population 37K) which has the distinction of being (1) the richest royals in Europe despite their tiny kingdom, and (2) the only royal family where a Prince has married a black woman. So if Scotland doesn't elect to become a republic, here are some photos of the family that could possibly be co-monarchs with Scotland and Liechtenstein. Prince Alfons is now 13 years old, so this is an old photo Prince Joseph-Wenzel is age 19. That is an old picture. The children don't have frequent photos taken (until they are 21). |
September 16th, 2014 at 12:00:59 PM permalink | |
TheCesspit Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 23 Posts: 1929 | I'm going to get some money down on the YES at the bookmakers. I think there's a lot of value there: http://www.theweek.co.uk/uk-news/scots-independence/60436/scottish-independence-odds-bookmakers-ignore-close-polls It is said that your life flashes before your eyes just before you die.... it's called Life |
September 16th, 2014 at 3:09:12 PM permalink | |
Wizard Administrator Member since: Oct 23, 2012 Threads: 239 Posts: 6095 |
I'll give you 3.5 to 1. I think the bookmakers will give you 4 to 1, but I'm trying to perceive an advantage too. Knowledge is Good -- Emil Faber |