Israel under Siege

May 26th, 2021 at 9:30:54 AM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 189
Posts: 18764
Quote: kenarman
People don't really hate on appearance. They end up being racist when they perceive that people that look a particular way are predomintly acting in ways they don't like. They then find it is reasonable to assume everyone with that appearance acts the same way. This can be motorcycle riders, people living in Southern rural USA, college students, teachers, Asians, Irish, Italian, tree huggers, military personal. Everyone makes their own list. Each of us also has friends that are exceptions to our own prejudiced view.


The way I hear some “far rightist” describe “intolerance of the left” makes me think that their idea of tolerance is that the Jewish people of Nazi German should have stated the Nazi’s simply have a difference of opinion or they weren’t being tolerant themselves.

Or gays or transgenders have to defend their right to exist in the rest of the world as simply a debate.

That’s bullshit.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really?
May 26th, 2021 at 9:52:14 AM permalink
missedhervee
Member since: Apr 23, 2021
Threads: 96
Posts: 3103
Racism is learned, taught behavior.

The target may or may not be "acting in ways they don't like;" consider for example blacks in America: a lot of whites hate them, but why, exactly?

What behavior are the blacks themselves as a whole guilty of engaging in which warrants universal approbation?

No, the causes of racism run very deep.
May 26th, 2021 at 11:14:03 AM permalink
DRich
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 51
Posts: 4969
Quote: missedhervee
Racism is learned, taught behavior.

The target may or may not be "acting in ways they don't like;" consider for example blacks in America: a lot of whites hate them, but why, exactly?

What behavior are the blacks themselves as a whole guilty of engaging in which warrants universal approbation?

No, the causes of racism run very deep.


Don't forget, racism works in both directions. There are lots of black people that are racist against white people. If you don't believe me hang out for a few weeks in Monroe Louisiana.
At my age a Life In Prison sentence is not much of a detrrent.
May 27th, 2021 at 2:13:16 PM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 189
Posts: 18764
Vox has an article that suggests American Jews are taught a very specific Israel narrative.

Oddly the charge sounds familiar to the right saying Universities indoctrinate too many leftist ideas.

Quote:
The major funders of Jewish education are on the center right to far right. That means that major educational institutions and organizations that are producing materials for Israel education are either producing material that is center right to far right or that is trying to avoid politics altogether just by doing culture and things like that. That’s a huge problem. Then you have groups which run these educational programs for high school and college students that inculcate a kind of laissez-faire, right-wing, conservative approach to the world — not only about Israel.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/american-jews-are-taught-a-very-specific-israel-narrative-can-that-change/ar-AAKryuZ?ocid=msedgntp
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really?
May 27th, 2021 at 2:38:10 PM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 189
Posts: 18764
I certainly have no argument against the idea that some conflicts overwhelmingly support a moral high ground for one side over the other.

But when conflicts are intense enough or go on long enough one should consider that legitimate griviences build up even on the low moral ground side.

Take WW2.

Quote:
See also: United States war crimes § World War II


Laconia incident: US aircraft attacking Germans rescuing the sinking British troopship in the Atlantic Ocean. For example, the pilots of a United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) B-24 Liberator bomber, despite knowing the U-boat's location, intentions, and the presence of British seamen, killed dozens of Laconia 's survivors with bombs and strafing attacks, forcing U-156 to cast their remaining survivors into the sea and crash dive to avoid being destroyed.
Unrestricted submarine warfare. Fleet Admiral Nimitz, the wartime commander-in-chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, provided unapologetic written testimony on Karl Dönitz's behalf at his trial that the U.S. Navy had waged unrestricted submarine warfare in the Pacific from the very first day the U.S. entered the war.
Canicattì massacre: killing of Italian civilians by Lieutenant Colonel McCaffrey. A confidential inquiry was made, but McCaffrey was never charged with an offense relating to the incident. He died in 1954. This incident remained virtually unknown until Joseph S. Salemi of New York University, whose father witnessed it, publicized it.[47][48]
In the Biscari massacre, which consists of two instances of mass murders, US troops of the 45th Infantry Division killed roughly 75 prisoners of war, mostly Italian.[49][50]
Near the French village of Audouville-la-Hubert, 30 German Wehrmacht prisoners (probably German Army soldiers) were killed by U.S. paratroopers.[2]
In the aftermath of the Malmedy massacre, a written order from the HQ of the 328th US Army Infantry Regiment, dated 21 December 1944, stated: No SS troops or paratroopers will be taken prisoner but will be shot on sight.[51] Major-General Raymond Hufft (US Army) gave instructions to his troops not to take prisoners when they crossed the Rhine in 1945. "After the war, when he reflected on the war crimes he authorized, he admitted, 'if the Germans had won, I would have been on trial at Nuremberg instead of them.'"[52] Stephen Ambrose related: "I've interviewed well over 1000 combat veterans. Only one of them said he shot a prisoner ... Perhaps as many as one-third of the veterans ... however, related incidents in which they saw other GIs shooting unarmed German prisoners who had their hands up."[53]
Chenogne massacre: On 1 January 1945, members of the 11th Armored Division executed 80 Wehrmacht soldiers.[54]
Jungholzhausen massacre: On 15 April 1945, the 254th Infantry Regiment of the 63rd Infantry Division executed between 13 and 30 Waffen SS and Wehrmacht prisoners of war.[55]
Treseburg massacre: On 19 April 1945, the 18th Infantry Regiment of the 1st Infantry Division captured and murdered 9 unarmed Hitler Youths near the village of Treseburg.[56]
Lippach massacre: On 22 April 1945 American soldiers from the 23rd Tank Battalion of the 12th Armored Division killed 24 Waffen SS soldiers who had been taken prisoners of war in the German town of Lippach. Members of the same unit are also alleged to have raped 20 women in the town.[57]
The Dachau liberation reprisals: Upon the liberation of Dachau concentration camp on 29 April 1945, about a dozen guards in the camp were shot by a machine gunner who was guarding them. Other soldiers of the 3rd Battalion, 157th Infantry Regiment, of the US 45th (Thunderbird) Division killed other guards who resisted. In all, about 30 were killed, according to the commanding officer Felix L. Sparks.[58][59] Later, Colonel Howard Buechner wrote that more than 500 were killed.[60][61]
Operation Teardrop: Eight of the surviving, captured crewmen from the sunken German submarine U-546 were tortured by US military personnel. Historian Philip K. Lundeberg has written that the beating and torture of U-546's survivors was a singular atrocity motivated by the interrogators' desire to quickly get information on what the U.S. believed were potential cruise missile or ballistic missile attacks on the continental US by German submarines.[62][63]
Historian Peter Lieb has found that many U.S. and Canadian units were ordered not to take enemy prisoners during the D-Day landings in Normandy. If this view is correct, it may explain the fate of 64 German prisoners (out of the 130 captured) who did not make it to the POW collecting point on Omaha Beach on the day of the landings.[1]
War rape
Secret wartime files made public only in 2006 reveal that American GIs committed more than 400 sexual offenses in Europe, including 126 rapes in England, between 1942 and 1945.[64] A study by Robert J. Lilly estimates that a total of 14,000 civilian women in England, France and Germany were raped by American GIs during World War II.[65][66] It is estimated that there were around 3,500 rapes by American servicemen in France between June 1944 and the end of the war and one historian has claimed that sexual violence against women in liberated France was common.[67]

In Taken by Force, J. Robert Lilly estimates the number of rapes committed by U.S. servicemen in Germany to be 11,040.[68] As in the case of the American occupation of France after the D-Day invasion, many of the American rapes in Germany in 1945 were gang rapes committed by armed soldiers at gunpoint.[69]

Although non-fraternization policies were instituted for the Americans in Germany, the phrase "copulation without conversation is not fraternization" was used as a motto by United States Army troops.[70] The journalist Osmar White, a war correspondent from Australia who served with the American troops during the war, wrote that

After the fighting moved on to German soil, there was a good deal of rape by combat troops and those immediately following them. The incidence varied between unit and unit according to the attitude of the commanding officer. In some cases offenders were identified, tried by court martial, and punished. The army legal branch was reticent, but admitted that for brutal or perverted sexual offences against German women, some soldiers had been shot – particularly if they happened to be Negroes. Yet I know for a fact that many women were raped by white Americans. No action was taken against the culprits. In one sector a report went round that a certain very distinguished army commander made the wisecrack, 'Copulation without conversation does not constitute fraternisation.'[7




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_war_crimes_during_World_War_II#:~:text=of%20the%20landings.-,War%20rape,England%2C%20between%201942%20and%201945.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really?
May 27th, 2021 at 3:00:24 PM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 189
Posts: 18764
Also I don't think many Americans realize how easy it is to antagonize citizens of another country when they argue that we're actually performing good services for them at our own expense while we have troops in their country.

Try to imagine how outraged a lot of small town Americans would be if they suddenly had to pass through a couple security checks manned by foreign troops just to get to work or the store across town. OMG. On our soil. We can't even get people to wear a paper mask without complaining about rights.

Yet we expect other nations to view occupations with some amount of reason and act surprised they respond so over the top.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really?
May 27th, 2021 at 3:06:03 PM permalink
Gandler
Member since: Aug 15, 2019
Threads: 27
Posts: 4256
Quote: rxwine
I certainly have no argument against the idea that some conflicts overwhelmingly support a moral high ground for one side over the other.

But when conflicts are intense enough or go on long enough one should consider that legitimate griviences build up even on the low moral ground side.

Take WW2.

Quote:
See also: United States war crimes § World War II


Laconia incident: US aircraft attacking Germans rescuing the sinking British troopship in the Atlantic Ocean. For example, the pilots of a United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) B-24 Liberator bomber, despite knowing the U-boat's location, intentions, and the presence of British seamen, killed dozens of Laconia 's survivors with bombs and strafing attacks, forcing U-156 to cast their remaining survivors into the sea and crash dive to avoid being destroyed.
Unrestricted submarine warfare. Fleet Admiral Nimitz, the wartime commander-in-chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, provided unapologetic written testimony on Karl Dönitz's behalf at his trial that the U.S. Navy had waged unrestricted submarine warfare in the Pacific from the very first day the U.S. entered the war.
Canicattì massacre: killing of Italian civilians by Lieutenant Colonel McCaffrey. A confidential inquiry was made, but McCaffrey was never charged with an offense relating to the incident. He died in 1954. This incident remained virtually unknown until Joseph S. Salemi of New York University, whose father witnessed it, publicized it.[47][48]
In the Biscari massacre, which consists of two instances of mass murders, US troops of the 45th Infantry Division killed roughly 75 prisoners of war, mostly Italian.[49][50]
Near the French village of Audouville-la-Hubert, 30 German Wehrmacht prisoners (probably German Army soldiers) were killed by U.S. paratroopers.[2]
In the aftermath of the Malmedy massacre, a written order from the HQ of the 328th US Army Infantry Regiment, dated 21 December 1944, stated: No SS troops or paratroopers will be taken prisoner but will be shot on sight.[51] Major-General Raymond Hufft (US Army) gave instructions to his troops not to take prisoners when they crossed the Rhine in 1945. "After the war, when he reflected on the war crimes he authorized, he admitted, 'if the Germans had won, I would have been on trial at Nuremberg instead of them.'"[52] Stephen Ambrose related: "I've interviewed well over 1000 combat veterans. Only one of them said he shot a prisoner ... Perhaps as many as one-third of the veterans ... however, related incidents in which they saw other GIs shooting unarmed German prisoners who had their hands up."[53]
Chenogne massacre: On 1 January 1945, members of the 11th Armored Division executed 80 Wehrmacht soldiers.[54]
Jungholzhausen massacre: On 15 April 1945, the 254th Infantry Regiment of the 63rd Infantry Division executed between 13 and 30 Waffen SS and Wehrmacht prisoners of war.[55]
Treseburg massacre: On 19 April 1945, the 18th Infantry Regiment of the 1st Infantry Division captured and murdered 9 unarmed Hitler Youths near the village of Treseburg.[56]
Lippach massacre: On 22 April 1945 American soldiers from the 23rd Tank Battalion of the 12th Armored Division killed 24 Waffen SS soldiers who had been taken prisoners of war in the German town of Lippach. Members of the same unit are also alleged to have raped 20 women in the town.[57]
The Dachau liberation reprisals: Upon the liberation of Dachau concentration camp on 29 April 1945, about a dozen guards in the camp were shot by a machine gunner who was guarding them. Other soldiers of the 3rd Battalion, 157th Infantry Regiment, of the US 45th (Thunderbird) Division killed other guards who resisted. In all, about 30 were killed, according to the commanding officer Felix L. Sparks.[58][59] Later, Colonel Howard Buechner wrote that more than 500 were killed.[60][61]
Operation Teardrop: Eight of the surviving, captured crewmen from the sunken German submarine U-546 were tortured by US military personnel. Historian Philip K. Lundeberg has written that the beating and torture of U-546's survivors was a singular atrocity motivated by the interrogators' desire to quickly get information on what the U.S. believed were potential cruise missile or ballistic missile attacks on the continental US by German submarines.[62][63]
Historian Peter Lieb has found that many U.S. and Canadian units were ordered not to take enemy prisoners during the D-Day landings in Normandy. If this view is correct, it may explain the fate of 64 German prisoners (out of the 130 captured) who did not make it to the POW collecting point on Omaha Beach on the day of the landings.[1]
War rape
Secret wartime files made public only in 2006 reveal that American GIs committed more than 400 sexual offenses in Europe, including 126 rapes in England, between 1942 and 1945.[64] A study by Robert J. Lilly estimates that a total of 14,000 civilian women in England, France and Germany were raped by American GIs during World War II.[65][66] It is estimated that there were around 3,500 rapes by American servicemen in France between June 1944 and the end of the war and one historian has claimed that sexual violence against women in liberated France was common.[67]

In Taken by Force, J. Robert Lilly estimates the number of rapes committed by U.S. servicemen in Germany to be 11,040.[68] As in the case of the American occupation of France after the D-Day invasion, many of the American rapes in Germany in 1945 were gang rapes committed by armed soldiers at gunpoint.[69]

Although non-fraternization policies were instituted for the Americans in Germany, the phrase "copulation without conversation is not fraternization" was used as a motto by United States Army troops.[70] The journalist Osmar White, a war correspondent from Australia who served with the American troops during the war, wrote that

After the fighting moved on to German soil, there was a good deal of rape by combat troops and those immediately following them. The incidence varied between unit and unit according to the attitude of the commanding officer. In some cases offenders were identified, tried by court martial, and punished. The army legal branch was reticent, but admitted that for brutal or perverted sexual offences against German women, some soldiers had been shot – particularly if they happened to be Negroes. Yet I know for a fact that many women were raped by white Americans. No action was taken against the culprits. In one sector a report went round that a certain very distinguished army commander made the wisecrack, 'Copulation without conversation does not constitute fraternisation.'[7




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_war_crimes_during_World_War_II#:~:text=of%20the%20landings.-,War%20rape,England%2C%20between%201942%20and%201945.




I don't want to get too deep into a discussion of WWII. But, I think most people would agree that the allied forces (maybe Russia would be exception, and lumping them in certainly can skew some numbers) were vastly morally superior to the axis. Japan pretty much specialized in war crimes (many people hyperfocus on Nazis in WWII, Japan was in my view, worse and rarely do people bring it up), and the Nazis well we all know what they did....

Many things in the above list are terrible. Some more than others.

The paragraphs about concentration camp Officers being killed while unarmed during the liberation, not something I would lose sleep over....

Shooting down enemy Uboats when there are allied prisoners on board? I don't know the circumstance, it may have been necessary. Or it may have though to have been necessary at the time. This is one of those quick decisions that people have to make and sadly are not often right, but its war.

The sexual assault is terrible and there is no excuse for that, but people were often punished (not always, and not enough clearly). However, 400 convicted cases when you are talking about a group war involving millions of allies, is a small number, yes even 1 is far too much, but look at how the numbers differ from areas Japan occupied....

That being said in massive Wars that involve millions of people (over 16 Million Americans alone, not counting all of the other allies), there are going to be long lists of individuals and units that get out of line. What really matters is the policy. The allies (again sadly Russia may be an exception at some points), did not have a policy of genocide or extermination of certain people. When Americans engaged in violent crimes, they were crimes that were not sanctioned by the government and were punished from it. This is very different from countries (Japan and Germany) who set up death camps have official policies encouraging the abuse of noncombatants (more so Japan, but to some degree Germany)..... Italy did some bad things, but not to the extent of Germany and Japan, and people in Italy actually rose up and took out the Fascist leaders on their own.

There is simply no comparison between America and Nazi Germany or Imperial Japan.
It was war, some Americans did some very terrible things. Germany and Japan revolved around doing terrible things in a systemic way....
May 27th, 2021 at 5:28:59 PM permalink
missedhervee
Member since: Apr 23, 2021
Threads: 96
Posts: 3103
The systemic racism in America was on display in WWII when the USA set up concentration camps for people of Japanese ancestry but not of German ancestry.

Heck, they even took the property of those of Japanes ancestry who were interred .

The obvious question: why only inter the Japanese when the Germans were presumably as culpable / likely to work against the American war effort?

The answer of course is systemic racism.
May 27th, 2021 at 5:48:03 PM permalink
Gandler
Member since: Aug 15, 2019
Threads: 27
Posts: 4256
Quote: missedhervee
The systemic racism in America was on display in WWII when the USA set up concentration camps for people of Japanese ancestry but not of German ancestry.

Heck, they even took the property of those of Japanes ancestry who were interred .

The obvious question: why only inter the Japanese when the Germans were presumably as culpable / likely to work against the American war effort?

The answer of course is systemic racism.


Those were not concentration camps, they were relocation centers. They were not based on race, but based on nationality. Germans were also detained. There were large numbers of Japanese and Germans who were loyal to their home country. Calling them concentration camps is a gross unfair parallel.

It was a ethically wrong policy that I would vehemently oppose, though it was a strategic success (detaining Germans and Japanese lowered espionage substantially). And, reparations were awarded shamefully late.

As for why Germans and Japanese were more likely to be against America, its not racism, it was reality. There were many German Americans loyal to the Nazi cause (including some very prominent ones), and the same with the Japanese, this was just reality. Its not "systemic racism" (though that did exist in America in other contexts during the time), its at best systemic prejudice towards national origin.

If America and Canada broke out in war, I would be suspect of people I know who are dual citizens, and even more so of people who are sole citizens. People tend to be loyal to their home country.

If you compare the relocation camps of America during WWII to the transfer camps in the Soviet Union during WWII which had a similar goal (our ally), they were far more humane.
May 27th, 2021 at 6:10:13 PM permalink
missedhervee
Member since: Apr 23, 2021
Threads: 96
Posts: 3103
You're qubbling: "internment camp" vs. "concentration camp."

Check the two images: one in Nazi Germany., the other is the Oregon desert.





Ripped from their homes and forcibly taken to remote camps where they were forced to stay against their will in very primitive conditions: it sounds a lot like Nazi Germany to me.

True, the Japanese Americans were not shot, gassed and beaten to death but I suspect that was because the president was a democrat.