Science and God
November 21st, 2016 at 9:06:35 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
Not at all I have said many times that I am wrong, something I have yet to see you do.
You are not 100% wrong on every topic, even on religion you sometimes say things that are true or quasi-true. About Catholicism you have been mostly wrong, but that is because of your sources and ignorance. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
November 22nd, 2016 at 7:44:05 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
The universe?
That's not entirely true. Information seems to have a hard time in the universe, but matter/energy does quite well. Suppose we take a painting, say Dali's Melted Clocks (whatever it's called), and burn it in an enclosed oven at 2,500 degrees for a suitable time. At the end the canvas, paint, nails and frame will have been reduced to ash and gasses. Has the painting been ended? Certainly. Has the matter making up the painting been ended? Certainly not. It's all there inside the oven. I'll go further and claim no matter has ever been ended. When you annihilate it with anti-matter, for example, it remains as energy in various forms. If you review the scenarios for the "end" of the universe, what ends is first habitability and then the transfer of energy. But the energy remains. Be it the Big Crunch, Big Rip, Little Rip, heat-death, etc. The universe doesn't end, so much as it becomes useless, cold and empty (or dense, hot and crowded, but still uninhabitable). Either way, the energy is still there. You're fond of asking how something can arise from nothing. let me flip the question: how can nothing come from something? Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
November 22nd, 2016 at 11:48:04 AM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Using Nareed's example, when you burn a painting, it's no longer a painting, it's become something else. It didn't end, it was changed. And will be changed many times in the future. You think you see a creation, so you invent a creator. What you're really seeing is something that was once something else and is now our universe. For now. No creator, no 'something out of nothing', just ongoing unstoppable evolution. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
November 22nd, 2016 at 5:15:57 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
What a great question. I would agree that once something is made or created it exists for ever or at least until God who alone can create or destroy does something. However, destruction doesn't seem like it is part of the plan. Our souls no matter if we do evil or good are not obliterated into nothingness at death but our souls are truly immortal. Again I really think it is a good example of the painting that is destroyed, but not really destroyed, because it still exists as ash and energy expelled into the world. However, it doesn't really bear on the still pressing question as to where did the materials from this painting first come from? Contingency does not make a statement about if something will continue for ever, but it simply states that something does not have the reason for its existence in itself, it is not a necessary being. This eternal matter or energy you posit being material did not create itself and therefore needs a creator. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
November 22nd, 2016 at 5:18:27 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
I know I see something that did not create itself and therefore needs a cause. I'm not inventing anything. It seems as if it is you who are inventing eternal material, which besides being illogical, has no proof or evidence to support it. You are going just on your limited experience and feeling and I suggest that there needs to be something more to posit such a ridiculous claim. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
November 22nd, 2016 at 5:24:01 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Actually, you don't know what you're seeing so you make assumptions. That's what all god religions do, they make broad assumptions (guesses) and fill in the blanks with theories disguised as facts. You think you see a creation so it's off to the races looking for a god who was behind it. Of course you found one, he's on the other side of the circle you're running in. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
November 22nd, 2016 at 5:28:15 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Didn't have to be created, it's always been here. You can't wrap your mind around this because it would mean your religion is pointless. In all god religions, god is the creator of everything, he's in charge. If the universe has been here forever god vanishes in an instant, there's no need for him and his man made rules. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
November 22nd, 2016 at 6:13:39 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
So my assumption is that material things did not create themselves and do not have the reason for their being in themselves. Your assumption is that material things have always been here and they do not have a cause or reason for their existence at all. If I am filling in the blanks you seem to be creating large holes in logic and reason. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
November 22nd, 2016 at 6:16:15 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
I can't wrap my mind around it because it doesn't make sense and it has no evidence to support it. However, I have told you before that many of our greatest theologians assumed like you do, based on their limited scientific knowledge, that the universe has always been around. You can even do a fundamentalist reading of Genesis and think this way. It doesn't mean that God is not needed or that religion is pointless. You still have to explain how this mass of eternal matter began to evolve, change, or move. You still need a first cause or an unmoved mover. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
November 22nd, 2016 at 6:52:55 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Everything is the result of random chance, there is no cause or reason behind anything on the basic level. This is what the evolution of random chance over eternity looks like. Eternity isn't a place, it's not a destination, it's the here and now, we're in it. And always will be. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |